War - limited death

[Mars]

If a war between two villages came, so many people wouldn't find due to fear of losing their character.
In a war, I propose a rule of one death per month (you can rejoin the game one month after dying)

This would make lots of people participate in wars without losing all their hard work.

[Konohuro]

This is a good idea from your point of view. It would balance a war between villages, a lost war would mean a great loss in numbers for that side giving an advantage for the opposite one.
But I don't think Vreg will be happy with this.
In war, people die, a lot of them. It would follow a month of halved activity, or even more. A great war between all villages will lead to a next month of a desolated SLO which would bring no gain to the game.

[Reminance]

This is a good idea from your point of view. It would balance a war between villages, a lost war would mean a great loss in numbers for that side giving an advantage for the opposite one.
But I don't think Vreg will be happy with this.
In war, people die, a lot of them. It would follow a month of halved activity, or even more. A great war between all villages will lead to a next month of a desolated SLO which would bring no gain to the game.

But if they all just die then that will be even worse.
All that hard work gone, And not everybody has the money to ressurect their character.

[Konohuro]

This is a good idea from your point of view. It would balance a war between villages, a lost war would mean a great loss in numbers for that side giving an advantage for the opposite one.
But I don't think Vreg will be happy with this.
In war, people die, a lot of them. It would follow a month of halved activity, or even more. A great war between all villages will lead to a next month of a desolated SLO which would bring no gain to the game.

But if they all just die then that will be even worse.
All that hard work gone, And not everybody has the money to ressurect their character.

I think Mars was suggesting free resurrection after one month after you've died in war.

[Reminance]

This is a good idea from your point of view. It would balance a war between villages, a lost war would mean a great loss in numbers for that side giving an advantage for the opposite one.
But I don't think Vreg will be happy with this.
In war, people die, a lot of them. It would follow a month of halved activity, or even more. A great war between all villages will lead to a next month of a desolated SLO which would bring no gain to the game.

But if they all just die then that will be even worse.
All that hard work gone, And not everybody has the money to ressurect their character.

I think Mars was suggesting free resurrection after one month after you've died in war.

Well like you already said SLO would be kind of dead for a month...

[SirTroll]

This is a good idea from your point of view. It would balance a war between villages, a lost war would mean a great loss in numbers for that side giving an advantage for the opposite one.
But I don't think Vreg will be happy with this.
In war, people die, a lot of them. It would follow a month of halved activity, or even more. A great war between all villages will lead to a next month of a desolated SLO which would bring no gain to the game.

But if they all just die then that will be even worse.
All that hard work gone, And not everybody has the money to ressurect their character.

I think Mars was suggesting free resurrection after one month after you've died in war.

Well like you already said SLO would be kind of dead for a month...

If it was after a war, surely only 2 villages would be effected?

If their allies got involved, I doubt that it would turn into a world war - but in that case we could offer free Resurrection for everyone when a clear winner is decided?

[Sanji]

well well that's good idea.

[lollernoob9]

How would a war end? When one side surrenders or they make a treaty? In that case, you would have to keep track of all the fights in permadeath zones during that time, and probably ressurect ppl who had nothing to do with the war.

[SirTroll]

Perhaps we could only resurrect people who died in war missions or were killed by people on war missions? that way we just need to give players a tag when they go on the mission, so if they die or kill someone they can be identified at the end?

I think war would end when a treaty is made, or if one side loses maybe 90% of it's shinobi they are declared defeated?
90% is just a guess btw i have no idea how many should need to be killed

[Mars]

Maybe a resurrection of less than one month than one month then, but add extreme debuffs eg not being able to use your strongest specialisation (ninjutsu, taijutsu etc)

[SirTroll]

Maybe a resurrection of less than one month than one month then, but add extreme debuffs eg not being able to use your strongest specialisation (ninjutsu, taijutsu etc)

Maybe they are 'resurrected' but can't do anything towards the war effort? just so they can still play but stops an endless war

So they can still train and they can still do other missions, but cant attack or be attacked by people still in the war?

[Mars]

Maybe a resurrection of less than one month than one month then, but add extreme debuffs eg not being able to use your strongest specialisation (ninjutsu, taijutsu etc)

Maybe they are 'resurrected' but can't do anything towards the war effort? just so they can still play but stops an endless war

So they can still train and they can still do other missions, but cant attack or be attacked by people still in the war?

Or they can't leave the village.
Some people would just die instantly to escape the war, that's what this suggestion is trying to counter

[SirTroll]

Maybe a resurrection of less than one month than one month then, but add extreme debuffs eg not being able to use your strongest specialisation (ninjutsu, taijutsu etc)

Maybe they are 'resurrected' but can't do anything towards the war effort? just so they can still play but stops an endless war

So they can still train and they can still do other missions, but cant attack or be attacked by people still in the war?

Or they can't leave the village.
Some people would just die instantly to escape the war, that's what this suggestion is trying to counter

That would work, but if the losing village has about 200 ninja bound inside it's village, surely that would cause lag/fps issues?
You can't expect everyone to have a supercomputer lol

[Yamasukage]

Maybe a resurrection of less than one month than one month then, but add extreme debuffs eg not being able to use your strongest specialisation (ninjutsu, taijutsu etc)

And maybe some cracks on their faces to show they were resurrected (not necessary bur throwing it in, its still cool)  but probably why not just bring back the guys like 20 min later (making them spectate) and keeping them locked in their villages for like 2-3 hhours or for as long as the war takes to prevent them from interfering but if their village is infilitrated then they can spawn in a further save zone bur they'll stay locked in it for some time (Add Edo Tensai-Reanimation just saying)

[Mars]

That would work, but if the losing village has about 200 ninja bound inside it's village, surely that would cause lag/fps issues?
You can't expect everyone to have a supercomputer lol

Good point there, can't think of a solution around that except instances. And instances are what ruin an MMO